Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · architecture

Fragmentary Face of King Khafre

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Travertine (Egyptian alabaster)

AI image analysis claude-haiku-4-5

Machine-generated from the object's image on May 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Fragmentary facial sculpture in travertine depicting a male face with well-defined features, showing damage to the left eye area and portions of the upper head.

This is a sculptural fragment showing the lower two-thirds of a male face carved from light-colored travertine (Egyptian alabaster). The remaining portions display careful modeling of the facial features: a broad, flat nose; full lips rendered with classical Egyptian proportions; and a strong, defined jawline. The right eye survives as a small almond-shaped cavity, while the left eye region is heavily damaged with significant loss to the surrounding area. The upper portion of the head is incompletely preserved. The carving demonstrates the refined sculptural technique characteristic of Old Kingdom royal statuary, with smooth surfaces and careful anatomical attention. The material's translucent quality is evident in the pale coloration and slight surface weathering consistent with ancient limestone exposure.

royal Old Kingdom, Dynasty IV (circa 2558-2532 BCE) fragmentary
Royals Khafre
Materials travertine (egyptian alabaster)

Connections

Found at Giza
Royals Khafre

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q29385732 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 26.7.1392 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 543896 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.