The King's Acquaintances Memi and Sabu
Description
Old Kingdom, Dynasty 4, ca. 2575–2465 B.C. Limestone, paint. H. 62 × W. 24.5 × D. 16 cm, 28.8 kg (24 7/16 × 9 5/8 × 6 5/16 in., 63.4 lb.). Probably from: Western Cemetery, Giza, Memphite Region. Subject: Couples, Men, Women. Credit: Rogers Fund, 1948.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Two kneeling male figures are carved in limestone and shown in profile facing a vertical back slab. Their heads have textured, close-fitting hair and they wear painted/red and blackened elements at the face and neck area; the slab bears incised marks consistent with hieroglyphic inscription placement but text is not clearly legible in the image.
The object is a sculpted limestone relief/block with a large vertical rectangular back slab on the right and two small-to-medium sized kneeling human figures on the left. The upper figure is turned in strict profile to the left, with a prominent nose, closed mouth, and a striped, woven-looking wig or cap texture across the scalp. The lower figure is also in left profile with a similar hairstyle. Both figures appear to stand or kneel with arms held close to the body, and faint traces of paint are visible, especially reddish/orange on the upper figure’s shoulder/upper arm and near the lower figure’s chest/torso. On the back slab, there are shallow incisions and small pits/marks that suggest an inscription field; however, the hieroglyphs are too indistinct and low-resolution to confidently read any specific signs. No Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text is visible. No cartouches are clearly identifiable from the provided view.
Cross-references (4)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.