Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · statue

Striding Figure

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Statue, striding man. Old Kingdom, Dynasty 4, ca. 2575–2465 B.C. Quartzite, paint. H. 89.5 cm (35 1/4 in.). Possibly from: Elkab, Southern Upper Egypt. Subject: Men. Credit: Harris Brisbane Dick Fund, 1962.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Back view of a standing/striding human figure carved in stone, with a rounded wig/head and a painted surface.

The image shows the rear (or heavily back-focused) view of a small standing sculpture. The figure has a rounded, ribbed wig or head covering and an elongated torso rendered in a simplified, block-like manner. The front details are not visible; the back face is dominated by vertical striations and mottled areas consistent with weathering and remaining paint. No clearly legible hieroglyphs or inscriptions are visible in the provided view. The catalogued material includes paint; a faint, patchy painted finish appears present on the stone surface, though the exact pigment is indistinct.

royal Old Kingdom (as catalogued); specific reign unclear. good
Materials quartzite (stone; appears as light gray/gray-black carved surface)paint (faint remnants)

Connections

Found at Elkab
Materials PaintQuartzite

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q29385739 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 62.200 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 543903 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.