Fitzwilliam Museum — Department of Antiquities (Egyptian) · funerary_equipment

cartonnage

Source of record: Fitzwilliam Museum — Department of Antiquities (Egyptian) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Painted and gilded funerary-style cartonnage mask/effigy showing a mummiform figure with a stylized face, wearing a decorated headdress and a broad gold-toned collar and tunic-like covering.

The image shows a fragmentary, arched cartonnage figure with a painted human face (heavy eye outlines, downcast expression) and a head covering/hair area rendered in multiple colors. A gold/yellow-toned surface covers the face and upper torso, with painted details around the eyes and nose. The figure wears a broad, collar-like element (gold-toned) and a pink-purple garment or inlaid textile-like patch on the chest and/or arms. The figure’s hands are depicted in a clasped or resting position at the lower right, with painted/relief fingers. There is no clearly legible hieroglyphic inscription visible on the provided view, and no cartouche is readable. Overall coloring is polychrome with traces of gilding and plastered layers, consistent with cartonnage construction.

funerary Roman (per catalogue) fragmentary
Materials painted plaster/cartonnagegilding (gold-toned surface)polychrome pigments (blue, green, red/pink, black outlines)

Connections

Materials WoodGoldGilding
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Fitzwilliam Museum — Department of Antiquities (Egyptian).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.