West wall of the chapel of Nikauhor and Sekhemhathor
Description
Limestone, paint
AI image analysis claude-haiku-4-5
Machine-generated from the object's image on May 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Reconstructed limestone wall relief from an Old Kingdom chapel featuring painted scenes of multiple officials and figures in hieroglyphic composition, with hieroglyphic inscriptions visible across the upper registers.
This is a composite limestone wall relief consisting of multiple blocks assembled to reconstruct the west wall of a chapel. The composition displays a formal arrangement of painted figures in red/ochre pigments against a light limestone background. Multiple human figures are depicted in various poses—some standing in formal postures, others in typical Egyptian profile viewing. Hieroglyphic inscriptions are visible in the upper registers and between figure groups. The painting technique shows typical Old Kingdom characteristics with figures rendered in hierarchical scale and arranged in horizontal registers. The preservation is moderate, with some pigment loss and weathering visible on the stone surface, though the overall composition and scenes remain discernible. The work appears to be a funerary chapel decoration combining figural scenes with textual/hieroglyphic elements typical of Old Kingdom tomb walls.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116413369 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 08.201.2a–g tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 543914 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.