Fitzwilliam Museum — Department of Antiquities (Egyptian) · papyrus

papyrus

Source of record: Fitzwilliam Museum — Department of Antiquities (Egyptian) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Fragmentary painted Egyptian papyrus with standing figures flanking horizontal bands of hieroglyphic text and decorative scenes.

The image shows a long, horizontally oriented papyrus fragment consisting of multiple detached sections. Several human figures in white garments stand facing inward on both left and right sides; each figure has a dark wig and holds or gestures toward the central areas. Between them are densely arranged black hieroglyphic signs organized in grid-like columns/blocks and additional painted registers containing vignettes and decorative elements. The central band includes small figures and animal-like motifs, though the exact subjects are not clearly readable at this resolution. No clear royal cartouche or throne name is legible. No Greek/Coptic/Arabic text is visible. The surface appears to be papyrus with painted ink/pigment, with substantial edge loss and missing sections.

religious New Kingdom (per catalogue); exact date unclear from image alone. fragmentary
Materials papyrusblack ink/paintcolored pigments (yellow/ochre, red/brown)
Signs multiple undeciphered hieroglyphic signs arranged in dense blocks/columns ×200

Connections

Found at Sedment Egypt
Materials Papyrus
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Fitzwilliam Museum — Department of Antiquities (Egyptian).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.