Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · other

Model of the "Opening of the Mouth" ritual equipment

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Tray: limestone; vessels: Travertine (Egyptian alabaster), greywacke

AI image analysis claude-haiku-4-5

Machine-generated from the object's image on May 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A limestone tray displaying miniature ritual vessels arranged in a symbolic pattern, representing the equipment used in the Egyptian Opening of the Mouth ceremony.

This artifact is a limestone tray displaying miniature ritual vessels arranged in a symbolic pattern for funerary purposes. The composition consists of a central ritual implement (possibly representing a ritualistic wand or tool) flanked symmetrically by six vessels: three vessels in darker greywacke stone on the left, and three in lighter travertine (Egyptian alabaster) on the right. The upper vessels include bulbous forms with flared rims and ovoid shapes, arranged across three rows. The limestone tray shows natural age-related patination and weathering consistent with Old Kingdom date. The symmetric arrangement and material contrast between dark and light vessels suggests ritual significance and careful symbolic ordering. The high relief or semi-sculptural carving demonstrates sophisticated craftsmanship of Old Kingdom funerary arts.

funerary Old Kingdom good
Materials limestonetravertine (Egyptian alabaster)greywacke

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116252247 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 07.228.117a–h tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 543920 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.