p.enteux.49 27. Febr. 221 v.Chr.Magdola (Arsinoites)
Reconnaissance d’une dette fictive via HGV-meta
Petition of Sopolis about a fictitious loan contract signed by his underage son. Petition to King Ptolemy IV from Sopolis, complaining that a hired woman named Demo of Krokodilopolis tricked his underage son into signing a loan contract for 1,000 drachmas though no money was paid. He asks the king to order the strategos Diophanes to investigate and force her to return the contract. It was filed at Magdola in the Arsinoite nome in 221 BC. machine translation
The same text in other collections
Linked by Trismegistos ID
TM 3324.
Each record below describes this same artifact or text from a different angle.
- chrest.mitt.224 DDbDP-text Magdola (Arsinoites)27. Febr. 221 v.Chr.
- Reconnaissance d’une dette fictive HGV-meta Magdola (Arsinoites)27. Febr. 221 v.Chr.
Inscriptions (1)
Transcription
[r]
βασιλεῖ Πτολεμαίωι χαίρειν Σώπολις. ἀδικοῦμαι ὑπὸ
Δημοῦς τινος, τῶν κατοικουσῶν ἐν Κροκοδίλων πόλει τοῦ
Ἀρσινοίτου νομοῦ, ἣ καὶ μισθαρνεῖ. παραστησαμένη γάρ τινας
ἐξ ἀπάτης, ἀνέπεισεν τὸν υἱόν μου Σώπολιν, οὐδέπω ὄντα τῶν
ἐτῶν, συγγράψασθαι αὐτῆι δανείου δραχμῶν Α. δέομαι οὖν σου, βασιλεῦ,
εἴ σοι δοκεῖ, συντάξαι Διοφάνει τῶι στρατηγῶι ἀνακαλέσασθαι
τήν τε Δημοῦν καὶ τὸν ἐπιγραφέντʼ αὐτῆς κύριον καὶ τὸν συγγραφοφύλακα, καὶ ἐξετάσαι μισοπονήρως καί, ἐὰν μὴ φαίνηται
χρῆσις τοῦ ἀργυρίου γεγενημένη κατὰ μηδένα τρόπον, ἡ δὲ
συγγραφὴ ἐπʼ ἀδικίαι γεγραμμένη, ἡμῖν μὲν ἐπαναγκάσαι αὐτὴν
ἀποδοῦναι τὴν συγγραφήν, περὶ δʼ αὐτῆς Διοφάνην τὸν
στρατηγὸν διαγνῶναι. τούτου γὰρ γενομένου, βασιλεῦ, οὐκ ἀδικηθήσομαι, χρείας καὶ σοὶ καὶ τῶι σῶι πατρὶ ἀμέμπτως παρεσχημένος.
εὐτύχει.
συναπεστάλη Δημήτριος Νικαγόρου. ἔτους α, Γορπιαίου λ, Τῦβι ιγ.
[v]
ἔτους α, Γορπιαίου λ, Τῦβι ιγ.
Σώπολις πρὸς Δημοῦν περὶ
[…]…ου
[…]…Translations (1)
Connections
Cross-references (3)
- TM-Text 3324 primary
- DDbDP-Text p.enteux;;49 tier-1
- HGV-Text 3324 tier-1
Similar inscriptions · by content embedding
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Papyri.info — DDbDP (Duke Databank of Documentary Papyri) — text.
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.
- Inherited across the Trismegistos spine — a Trismegistos ID names one ancient text, and papyrology splits that text's description across databases: the edition in one, the date and provenance in another, the physical papyrus in a third. Fields tagged via … on this page were read from a sibling record under the same TM number, not asserted by Papyri.info — DDbDP (Duke Databank of Documentary Papyri) — text.
- date — from HGV-meta, TM-Text 3324 (see that record)
- find site — from HGV-meta, TM-Text 3324 (see that record)
- find point — from HGV-meta, TM-Text 3324 (see that record)