Fragment of a Dish Dedicated by Two Kings to the Goddess Hathor of Dendera
Description
Slate
AI image analysis claude-haiku-4-5
Machine-generated from the object's image on May 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Fragment of a slate dish with hieroglyphic inscriptions and ritual imagery, including depictions of divine offerings and garments, dedicated to Hathor of Dendera by royal patrons in the Middle Kingdom.
This is a fragmentary slate vessel displaying finely carved hieroglyphic relief. The composition is organized into multiple registers. The upper portion shows a bird (likely a vulture or sacred bird) in profile. Below this is a series of clearly carved hieroglyphic signs arranged vertically and horizontally. The left side features what appears to be a pleated linen garment or kilt rendered with fine parallel lines, characteristic of Middle Kingdom representational conventions. The right portion contains additional hieroglyphic signs, including what appears to be a cartouche or enclosed sign. The overall style and execution are consistent with Middle Kingdom funerary or votive offering vessels. The relief is well-preserved in parts, though the object is clearly fragmentary with losses to its lower edges. The carving technique demonstrates skilled workmanship typical of elite workshops.
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116413394 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 09.180.543 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 543945 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.