Ointment jar from a Foundation Deposit of Hatshepsut's Valley Temple
Description
New Kingdom, Dynasty 18, Joint reign of Hatshepsut and Thutmose III, ca. 1479–1458 B.C. Travertine (Egyptian alabaster). H. 12 cm (4 3/4 in.). From: Hatshepsut Causeway, Foundation Deposit (secondary dep. 14-60), Asasif, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Excavation: Carnarvon excavations, 1912. Subject: Hieroglyphs. Credit: Purchase, Edward S. Harkness Gift, 1926.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A carved, alabaster-like ointment jar with a flared body and a flat rim, bearing an incised vertical register of hieroglyphic text on its front.
The image shows a museum-displayed, pale stone vessel shaped like a small jar: a wide, flaring midsection tapering slightly downward to a narrow base, with a thicker, flat rim at the top. The surface appears smooth and polished. On the front of the body, there is an incised block of hieroglyphic signs arranged in a vertical column/rectangular area, though the individual signs are not fully legible at this resolution. No clearly identifiable cartouche with a royal name is confidently readable. The background and mounting are modern; no additional markings are visible beyond the single hieroglyphic inscription area. The object aligns generally with the catalogue description of an ointment jar, and there is no clear visual contradiction to the proposed material or function, though the text content cannot be securely transcribed.
Inscriptions (1)
Visible text (machine reading)
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116252225 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 26.7.1433a, b tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 543947 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.