Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · vessel

Canopic Jar Representing the Deity Hapy

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Limestone, paint

AI image analysis claude-haiku-4-5

Machine-generated from the object's image on May 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A limestone canopic jar with a zoomorphic lid featuring the head of a baboon, characteristic of the deity Hapy, used for storing mummified organs.

This is a canopic jar with a cylindrical body and a distinctive zoomorphic lid. The lid is carved in the form of a baboon head, recognizable by its characteristic facial features including prominent ears, elongated muzzle, and naturalistic facial coloring with pigment still visible on the face. The baboon head rests on a rectangular support piece that sits atop the cylindrical jar body. The limestone exhibits the warm cream-tan coloration typical of Egyptian limestone artifacts from the Nile Valley. The entire piece shows evidence of age and wear consistent with funerary objects from the Late Period. The baboon form is iconographically consistent with Hapy, the god associated with the Nile inundation and one of the four sons of Horus, whose canopic jar traditionally protected the intestines in mummified remains.

funerary good
Deities Hapy
Materials limestonepaint

Connections

Found at Abydos
Deities HapiHapy

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116252215 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 12.183.1b.1–.2 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 543953 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.