Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · vessel

Canopic Jar Representing the Deity Qebehsenuef

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Limestone, paint

AI image analysis claude-haiku-4-5

Machine-generated from the object's image on May 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A limestone canopic jar with a human-headed lid, characteristic of Late Period Egyptian funerary equipment used to contain mummified organs.

This canopic jar exemplifies Late Period funerary practice, featuring a naturalistic human head surmounting a bulbous ovoid vessel body. The head displays finely carved facial features with large, well-defined eyes inlaid or defined with dark pigment, a straight nose, and carefully modeled lips. The ears are rendered in relief on either side of the head. The smooth rounded form of the jar body is characteristic of containers designed to hold mummified organs during the mummification process. The limestone material exhibits a pale cream-colored patina consistent with objects from Abydos. The workmanship suggests a skilled craftsman, typical of Saite period canopic jar production during the 26th Dynasty. No visible hieroglyphic inscriptions are apparent on the photographed surface.

funerary Late Period (Saite, 26th Dynasty) good
Deities Qebehsenuef
Materials limestonepaint

Connections

Found at Abydos
Deities Qebehsenuef
Materials LimestonePaint

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116252214 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 12.183.1c.1–.2 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 543954 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.