Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · vessel

Cosmetic jar with lid

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Travertine (Egyptian alabaster)

AI image analysis claude-haiku-4-5

Machine-generated from the object's image on May 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A cylindrical cosmetic jar carved from travertine (Egyptian alabaster) with a flared rim and tapered waist, characteristic of Middle Kingdom luxury vessels. The vessel features a simple, elegant form with a fitted lid.

This travertine cosmetic jar exemplifies the refined aesthetic of Middle Kingdom Egyptian craftsmanship. The vessel displays a classic beaker or tumbler form with a wider mouth that tapers toward the center before expanding slightly at the base, creating a graceful silhouette. The rim is finished with a polished horizontal lip, and the material shows the natural honey-golden coloring typical of Egyptian alabaster. The translucent quality of the stone is visible in the upper portions. A small chip or damage mark is visible on the rim area, consistent with the wear expected of an artifact of considerable age. The workmanship demonstrates skilled stone-turning, with smooth curved surfaces throughout. This vessel type was commonly used for storing cosmetics, oils, or precious unguents in elite households and funerary contexts during the Middle Kingdom period.

decorative good
Materials travertine (Egyptian alabaster)

Connections

Found at Asasif

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116252203 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 26.7.1441a, b tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 543957 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.