Manchester Museum — Egypt and Sudan collection · papyrus

Ostracon

Source of record: Manchester Museum — Egypt and Sudan collection — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A reddish pottery fragment (ostracon) with a small red-ink hieroglyphic inscription visible on the front surface.

The image shows a small, rectangular-to-trapezoidal shard of fired clay with a sandy orange-red fabric. The surface has a few pale hairline cracks and an overall matte finish. Near the upper right area there is a short line of red painted marks resembling a limited hieroglyphic sign group; the exact characters are not fully legible from the photograph. No other text scripts (Greek/Coptic/Arabic) are clearly visible. A modern scale label with the word “MANCHESTER” is present in the lower portion of the image but is not part of the ancient artifact.

hieroglyphic only Middle Kingdom (catalogue ground truth) fragmentary
Materials fired pottery (ostracon/shard)red paint/ink
Signs unknown red-painted hieroglyphic sign group (inscription fragment) ×2
Visible text "Unclear/illegible red-painted hieroglyphic marks near upper right; exact transcription not possible from the image."

Connections

Found at Haraga
Materials Pottery

Cross-references (3)

  • Manchester-Accession 6132 tier-2
  • Manchester-IRN 106734 tier-2
  • Manchester-UUID 56bf23c8-e8bb-36da-873a-27911766eb50 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Manchester Museum — Egypt and Sudan collection.
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.