Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art · papyrus

Papyrus Fragment Inscribed in Greek

Source of record: Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Caption: Papyrus Fragment Inscribed in Greek, 6th century C.E.. Papyrus, ink, Glass: 10 7/16 x 16 7/16 in. (26.5 x 41.7 cm) Object: 6 5/16 x 6 7/8 in. (16 x 17.5 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Gift of Theodora Wilbour, 35.1479. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum)

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A worn papyrus sheet fragment filled with dark ink in tightly packed lines of script. The text appears non-hieroglyphic and is consistent with an ink inscription on papyrus, with no clearly legible deity or royal names.

The image shows a rectangular papyrus fragment with uneven edges and losses, covered by dense, horizontally arranged lines of dark ink. The writing is cursive/handwritten in appearance rather than the clearly structured columns typical of Egyptian hieroglyphs. There are no clearly identifiable Egyptian cartouches or royal titulary elements visible at this resolution. No explicit illustrations, figures, or iconographic elements are present—only text. The script is not sufficiently legible to confirm whether it is Greek specifically; however, the overall format (inscribed papyrus in ink) matches the catalogue description. No other scripts (Coptic/Arabic) can be confidently identified.

hieroglyphic only Late Antique Period (as catalogued); exact script identification unclear from the image. fragmentary
Materials papyrusink

Connections

Materials InkPapyrus

Cross-references (2)

  • BKM-Accession 35.1479 tier-2
  • BKM-Object 45085 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.