Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art · papyrus

Frieze of Animals in Plant Scrolls

Source of record: Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Object Label: By the time this frieze of animals was carved in the fourth century C.E., most Egyptians were Christians and had adopted a biblical view of animals as subordinate to humans. Though animals continued to play an important role in decoration and symbolism, there was no place for animals with souls in Christian thinking. Caption: Coptic. Frieze of Animals in Plant Scrolls, 4th century C.E.. Limestone, pigment, 14 3/8 x 50 3/16 x 4 5/8 in., 131 lb. (36.5 x 127.5 x 11.7 cm, 59.42kg). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 41.1266. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum)

AI image analysis GPT-4o-2024-08-06

Machine-generated from the object's image on May 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Stone fragment with carved animal figures enclosed in circular designs.

The artifact is a stone carving featuring three distinct animal figures, each enclosed within circular vine patterns. The carving is highly detailed, showcasing the animals in dynamic poses. The craftsmanship suggests an emphasis on naturalistic representation and stylized design typical of decorative motifs.

decorative unknown good
Materials limestone

Connections

Materials Limestone

Cross-references (2)

  • BKM-Accession 41.1266 tier-2
  • BKM-Object 52647 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.