Manchester Museum — Egypt and Sudan collection · vessel

Vessel

Source of record: Manchester Museum — Egypt and Sudan collection — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A small, roughly shaped stone/pottery vessel fragment with a partially visible incised inscription or marks near one edge.

The image shows a single vessel fragment photographed against a dark background. The object has an irregular, rounded form and appears to be made from a hard material with a mottled surface consistent with pottery or stone; its edges are worn. Near the lower-left area, there are several dark, engraved/painted characters or marks that resemble a short inscription, but they are too unclear to confidently read. No legible Greek/Coptic/Arabic text is visible. No clearly identifiable royal cartouche is present.

decorative Predynastic Period (per catalogue; image details insufficient for independent confirmation). fragmentary
Materials pottery (per catalogue; visual appearance also consistent with stone/limestone fragment—unclear)
Signs incised/painted sign cluster ×4
Visible text "Unclear short incised/painted character cluster near lower-left; exact letters not readable."

Connections

Found at Armant

Cross-references (3)

  • Manchester-Accession 10120 tier-2
  • Manchester-IRN 107046 tier-2
  • Manchester-UUID 58db3e04-8c36-3ccf-9dbd-2d282958c08b tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Manchester Museum — Egypt and Sudan collection.
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.