Manchester Museum — Egypt and Sudan collection · vessel

Vessel

Source of record: Manchester Museum — Egypt and Sudan collection — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A small, broken terracotta/pottery vessel fragment with a small patch of incised or impressed decoration arranged in rectangular bands on its surface.

The image shows a single fragment of a pottery vessel resting against a dark, speckled background. The object is broken, with only a portion of the original vessel shape preserved. On the visible face there appear to be small, repeated impressions/incisions forming block-like or grid-like rectangular units arranged in rows, suggesting decorative marking rather than legible carved hieroglyphs. A museum label with the words “MANCHESTER 1824 The University of Manchester The Manchester Museum” is visible below the object, with a ruler/scale above it marked in centimeters (0–5 cm). No cartouches, royal names, or clear hieroglyphic signs can be confidently read. No Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text is visible on the artifact. The fragment is consistent in appearance with the catalogue’s identification as a pottery vessel piece, though the period is not determinable from the image alone.

daily life Predynastic Period (as per catalogue; cannot verify from image alone) fragmentary
Materials Pottery/terracotta
Signs incised/impressed decorative pattern (unidentified)

Connections

Found at Armant

Cross-references (3)

  • Manchester-Accession 10271 tier-2
  • Manchester-IRN 107669 tier-2
  • Manchester-UUID 0fbc0e90-1daf-3510-9b3b-3b4277fc59fa tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Manchester Museum — Egypt and Sudan collection.
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.