Manchester Museum — Egypt and Sudan collection · vessel

Vessel

Source of record: Manchester Museum — Egypt and Sudan collection — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A small, broken pottery vessel sherd or fragment with partial incised/painted markings near the top edge.

The image shows a reddish-brown pottery fragment photographed against a dark background, with the vessel’s painted/incised surface markings preserved only in part. Near the upper area of the fragment there appears to be a cluster of black/red marks resembling a simple sign or alphanumeric notation; however, the shapes are incomplete and cannot be securely identified as specific hieroglyphs. The rest of the fragment shows no clearly diagnostic iconography. A measuring scale with the label “MANCHESTER 1824” (and smaller text including “The University of Manchester” and “The Manchester Museum”) is placed beneath the object, indicating the catalog/collection context of the photograph. No Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text is visible; no clear deities, royal names, or cartouches are identifiable from the fragment. The museum catalogue’s description of the object as a vessel and material as pottery is consistent with what is visible (ceramic fragment).

decorative Predynastic Period (per catalogue; markings too fragmentary to refine from image) fragmentary
Materials Pottery (ceramic fragment)
Signs Unidentified partial sign cluster

Connections

Found at Armant
Materials Pottery

Cross-references (3)

  • Manchester-Accession 10187 tier-2
  • Manchester-IRN 107686 tier-2
  • Manchester-UUID 06a4183c-6897-3f4a-b233-abcb44ce6284 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Manchester Museum — Egypt and Sudan collection.
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.