Elaborately Painted Shroud of Neferhotep, Son of Herrotiou
Description
Caption: Elaborately Painted Shroud of Neferhotep, Son of Herrotiou, 100–225 C.E.. Linen, pigment, 21 1/8 × 69 in. (53.6 × 175.3 cm) As mounted: 76 7/8 × 29 1/8 × 2 in. (195.3 × 74 × 5.1 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 75.114. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum)
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A painted linen shroud shows a frontal human figure with attendants of birds and winged imagery around it, framed by vertical registers of dark hieroglyphic-style text and decorative motifs.
The image depicts a vertically oriented, rectangular linen shroud with extensive polychrome decoration. In the center is a seated or standing-fronted deceased figure rendered in skin-toned paint, with short dark hair and a painted face. The figure wears light, patterned garments and is positioned above a bordered lower zone filled with geometric shapes (including diamond/chain-like patterns) and lines. Around the central figure are large decorative motifs resembling winged forms with outstretched wings and bird-like elements, set within a dark outline. Along both sides of the shroud there are multiple vertical columns of hieroglyph-like signs (dark ink/paint on the pale background). At the top there is an oval/eye-like element beneath a curved, winged halo or fan-shaped decoration, consistent with Egyptian funerary iconography. No clear cartouche with a legible royal name is visible at this resolution. The overall surface appears aged but not severely fragmented.
Cross-references (2)
- BKM-Accession 75.114 tier-2
- BKM-Object 3845 tier-2
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.