Cartonnage Mask of a Woman
Description
Caption: Cartonnage Mask of a Woman, 1st century C.E.. Linen, gesso, gold leaf, glass, faience, 23 x 14 x 9 in. (58.4 x 35.6 x 22.9 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 69.35. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum)
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A gold-painted cartonnage mask of a woman, shown frontally with blue-inlaid eyes and a wavy headdress background.
The image depicts a compact, bust-shaped female cartonnage mask, presented against a dark background. The face is modeled with smooth features and a calm expression; large almond-shaped eyes are accented with dark outlines and bright blue pigment in the irises/eyelids, while the eyebrows and hairline are defined in darker paint. The headdress/hood falls on both sides of the head and is heavily gilded, with a textured, beaded or braided strip along the brow area. The neck and shoulders are also gilded and continue into a garment-like painted surface. On the upper chest sits a collar or necklace with roundels/pendant-like elements rendered in lighter paint. One hand (left side of the image) is visible holding a reddish/purple, textured object or cloth; the other arm/hand extends across the lower area. Several painted line groups and curvilinear markings appear on the chest and arms, resembling stylized ornament or possible cursive script, but no clear, fully legible hieroglyphic text is identifiable at this resolution. No cartouche or royal name is visible. There is no clearly readable Greek/Coptic/Arabic text. The object’s gold surface indicates gilding over gesso and textile substrate typical of cartonnage.
Cross-references (2)
- BKM-Accession 69.35 tier-2
- BKM-Object 3778 tier-2
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.