Snakebite Papyrus
Description
Caption: Snakebite Papyrus, 6th–4th century B.C.E.. Papyrus, ink, a: Glass: 15 13/16 x 27 5/8 in. (40.2 x 70.2 cm) a: Object: 10 13/16 x 26 3/16 in. (27.5 x 66.5 cm) b: Glass: 15 3/4 x 29 1/2 in. (40 x 75 cm) b: Object: 10 11/16 x 25 3/8 in. (27.2 x 64.5 cm) c: Glass: 15 3/4 x 22 3/16 in. (40 x 56.3 cm) c: Object: 10 13/16 x 18 3/8 in. (27.5 x 46.7 cm) d: Small Box of Fragments: 1 3/4 x 4 1/16 x 4 1/16 in.. Brooklyn Museum, Bequest of Theodora Wilbour from the collection of her father, Charles Edwin Wilbour, 47.218.85a-f.
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A mounted papyrus fragment on a display sheet with scattered inked hieroglyphic text fragments arranged across the right side and a handwritten note in the center.
The image shows an object mounted under glass in a museum mount. On the right side of the mount there are numerous small, rectangular orange-brown papyrus pieces with black/dark ink marks on them, suggesting broken segments of an ink-written papyrus. In the middle-left area there is a clearer, handwritten inscription in dark ink (likely cataloguer/curatorial handwriting rather than ancient Egyptian), including bracketed text at the bottom. No clear, complete ancient hieroglyphic signs, royal titulary, or cartouches are legible at this resolution; the ink marks on the papyrus fragments are too fragmented to identify specific signs confidently. No Greek/Coptic/Arabic text is visible. The visible materials include papyrus and ink (as catalogued), with the mount and backing not counted as primary materials.
Inscriptions (1)
Visible text (machine reading)
Cross-references (2)
- BKM-Accession 47.218.85a-f tier-2
- BKM-Object 124173 tier-2
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.