Funerary Shroud
Description
Caption: Funerary Shroud, 1st century B.C.E. or later. Linen, pigment, gold leaf, 37.1815Ea: 16 15/16 x 19 5/16 in. (43 x 49 cm) 37.1815Eb: 26 3/4 x 13 3/8 in. (68 x 34 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 37.1815Ea-b. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum)
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A fragmentary painted funerary textile with dense panels of inked hieroglyphs and stylized figures, bordered by bands and dark vertical elements.
The object appears as a rectangular cloth fragment (likely a shroud panel) with significant edge loss and fringe along the bottom. Multiple horizontal registers/panels contain dark-ink hieroglyphic lines and painted or drawn figures. Several vertical bands with repeating rectangular or stepped motifs run along portions of the left and right sides, forming a patterned border. The central field is dominated by a large rectangular composition with additional smaller lines and symbols inside, suggesting a litany or decorative funerary program. No clear cartouche (royal name in an oval) is readable from the provided resolution. The surface shows discoloration consistent with age and pigment/ink application. No visible Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text is apparent. No clearly visible gold leaf is discernible in the image; the catalogue’s stated use of gold leaf cannot be confirmed visually.
Cross-references (2)
- BKM-Accession 37.1815Ea-b tier-2
- BKM-Object 118334 tier-2
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.