Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art · statue

Figure of Harpocrates

Source of record: Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Caption: Figure of Harpocrates, 305–30 B.C.E., or later. Clay, pigment, 7 5/8 x 1 1/4 x 2 5/8 in. (19.3 x 3.1 x 6.6 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 37.1622E.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A small Egyptian terracotta figure shows a bearded male deity seated in a rigid pose, wearing a tall conical/crown-like headdress and holding a long staff or attribute.

The image depicts a standing/seated human-like figure rendered in light-colored clay with traces of painted decoration. The figure has a prominent face with a beard and a stylized headdress that rises to a point above the head. One arm is raised across the body holding a curved/long object, while the other side shows the arm bent near the torso. The body wears layered garments rendered with vertical incised folds. The figure is backed/anchored by a block-like base with a simplified platform border. No clearly legible hieroglyphs, cartouches, or alphabetic text are visible at this resolution. The pose and iconography are consistent with a small deity figurine, though specific identification as Harpocrates cannot be confirmed visually from the available image details alone.

religious Ptolemaic Period (or later) good
Deities Harpocrates (unconfirmed visually)
Materials Claypigment (faint traces)

Connections

Found at Saqqara
Deities Harpocrates

Cross-references (2)

  • BKM-Accession 37.1622E tier-2
  • BKM-Object 118147 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.