Illustrated Papyrus
Description
Caption: Illustrated Papyrus, 305–30 B.C.E.. Papyrus, pigment, ink, 13 15/16 × 11 15/16 × 15/16 in. (35.4 × 30.3 × 2.4 cm) mount: 18 × 14 × 1 in. (45.7 × 35.6 × 2.5 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 37.1647Ea3. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum)
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A badly worn illustrated papyrus fragment shows a standing male figure in Egyptian royal attire holding a long staff-like implement.
The image depicts a tall, human figure centered on a surviving portion of a papyrus sheet. The background is a uniform brownish papyrus ground with extensive tears and losses exposing the white support beneath in irregular vertical and horizontal areas. The figure wears a striped ceremonial kilt and a dark headdress/hat with a gold-toned face element; a red-and-gold collar or broad neck ornament is visible. The figure holds a staff or long ceremonial object in the right hand (partially preserved), and wears accessories at the lower arms/hands (one hand gripping the staff; the left hand raised or bent toward the body). Minimal clear hieroglyphic text is preserved; only a small cluster of marks near the headdress/upper chest area is visible, but it is too fragmentary to read confidently. No clearly legible cartouche or royal name is visible. No Greek/Coptic/Arabic script is apparent.
Cross-references (2)
- BKM-Accession 37.1647Ea3 tier-2
- BKM-Object 224474 tier-2
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.