Sarcophagus Lid of a Royal Scribe
Description
Caption: Sarcophagus Lid of a Royal Scribe, ca. 305–30 B.C.E.. Limestone and gesso, 82 x 24 1/2 x 14 1/2 in., 920 lb. (208.3 x 62.2 x 36.8 cm, 417.31kg). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 34.1221. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum)
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Painted limestone sarcophagus lid showing a human-headed figure with a blackened face, wearing a nemes-style headdress and a broad collar.
The image shows a tall, human-shaped stone lid with a rounded crown and a forward-facing, idealized face. The figure has closely rendered facial features and a darkened/black paint residue on the face. A nemes-like headdress is suggested by vertical striping along the sides of the head, and the figure wears a broad, striped collar across the upper chest. The sides of the object are covered with vertical registers of painted hieroglyphs, though most signs are damaged or heavily abraded and are difficult to transcribe precisely from the photograph. No Greek, Coptic, or Arabic script is clearly visible. No legible cartouche is confidently identifiable at this resolution; the central text area appears to include multiple lines of Egyptian hieroglyphs, but individual royal names cannot be reliably extracted. The museum label is present in the right background but contains no readable inscription from the image itself.
Connections
Cross-references (2)
- BKM-Accession 34.1221 tier-2
- BKM-Object 3343 tier-2
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.