Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art · statue

Royal Head

Source of record: Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Caption: Royal Head, 4th century B.C.E.. Limestone, 8 1/4 x 6 11/16 in. (21 x 17 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Gift of Evangeline Wilbour Blashfield, Theodora Wilbour, and Victor Wilbour honoring the wishes of their mother, Charlotte Beebe Wilbour, as a memorial to their father, Charles Edwin Wilbour, 16.169.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Stone fragment carved as a human head with a headcloth/helmet-like headdress, shown in close-up against a dark background.

The image shows a carved stone “royal head” with prominent facial features and a stylized headdress covering the sides of the head. The forehead and brow are smoothed with incised details in the hair/headdress area; a semicircular fold/strap-like element is visible near the temple and cheek. The surface is weathered with darker spots consistent with old grime or tool marks, but no clearly readable hieroglyphs or cartouches are apparent in this view. No modern labels or text overlays are visible. The object appears to be a single carved limestone piece with rounded contours; edges show breaks consistent with fragmentary condition.

royal Late Period to Ptolemaic Period (per catalogue; specific king not readable) fragmentary
Materials limestone (stone)

Connections

Found at Abydos
Materials Limestone

Cross-references (2)

  • BKM-Accession 16.169 tier-2
  • BKM-Object 3152 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.