Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art · vessel

Ibis-Form Mummy in Jar Late Period to Ptolemaic PeriodEgypt

Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art, acc. 37.1952Ea-c. Public domain (CC0). Copy archived by egyptianinscriptions.org with attribution; original at the holding institution.

+ 2 more images

Accession: 37.1952Ea-c
Find spot: Egypt, Egypt approx. site location
Period: Late Period to Ptolemaic Period
Dynasty: Dynasty 27, or later
Date: 510–210 B.C.E.
Date range: 510 BCE – 210 BCE
Materials: ['Clay', 'animal remains', 'linen']
Height: 16.0 cm
Width: 8.5 cm
Repository: Brooklyn Museum
At source: View original →

Cite & export

Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art, Ibis-Form Mummy in Jar (37.1952Ea-c). Egyptian Inscriptions Database. https://egyptianinscriptions.org/object/18280

JSON →

Description

Object Label: Ceramic jars were common, inexpensive coffins for animal mummies. There were two types of lids. In the first, a lid for an ordinary jar could be fashioned from mud and straw. In the second, an opening could be made in the jar while the clay was still wet; both the jar and its cover could then be fired together. Caption: Ibis-Form Mummy in Jar, 510–210 B.C.E.. Clay, animal remains, linen, 6 5/16 × 3 3/8 × 2 3/4 in. (16 × 8.5 × 7 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 37.1952Ea-c. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum (Gavin Ashworth, photographer))

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

A machine reading of the photograph made Jul 2026: deities, names, signs and a description as the model saw them. Not curatorial; treat it as the model's best reading, not authority.

Connections

Materials Clay Textile Linen-Like Wrappings

Cross-references (2)

BKM-Accession 37.1952Ea-c tier-2
BKM-Object 118456 tier-2

About this record's data

From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.