Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art · vessel

Vase with Face of Bes on One Side

Source of record: Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Caption: Vase with Face of Bes on One Side, 664–332 B.C.E.. Clay, 4 13/16 x Diam. 2 3/8 in. (12.2 x 6 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 37.329E. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum)

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A small clay vessel with a rounded body and a narrow neck, decorated on one side with a carved face-like motif, including two circular eye shapes and a central decorative feature.

The image shows a rounded clay vessel (amphora/jar form) with a short, flaring neck and a wider spherical body. The front/one visible side has a molded or carved face-like decoration: two circular/looped shapes positioned where eyes would be, and a central element (possibly nose/mouth or a stylized facial marking) beneath/among them. The surface appears worn with dark speckling and patina, consistent with fired clay and age-related erosion. No clear hieroglyphic text, cartouches, or other inscriptions are legible on the photo. No other materials or added pigments are clearly visible beyond the clay body itself.

decorative Late Period (as per catalogue ground truth); exact subperiod unclear from image alone good
Deities Bes (face motif; identification based on catalogue title and face-like features, but not fully confirmable from image alone)
Materials Clay

Connections

Found at Saqqara
Materials PotteryClay

Cross-references (2)

  • BKM-Accession 37.329E tier-2
  • BKM-Object 117001 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.