Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art · jewelry

Wadjet-eye Amulet

Source of record: Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Caption: Wadjet-eye Amulet, ca. 664–30 B.C.E.. Sheet gold, 1/2 x 11/16 in. (1.3 x 1.8 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 08.480.217. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum)

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Small gold Egyptian amulet shaped like an eye with a protective/amuletic design consistent with a Wadjet-style eye.

The image shows a small, irregularly contoured piece of gold laid against a fabric-like background. The object appears to depict a stylized eye: an almond-shaped form with an inner pupil/marking, and an overarching brow/winged element. A small vertical tab-like projection hangs from the lower right area, suggesting it may have been attached to a string or backing or that it formed part of the amulet’s suspension/attachment. No clear hieroglyphic inscriptions, cartouches, or other text are visible in the photograph. The overall finish is bright and reflective, consistent with a thin gold sheet or gold foil construction (though the exact method—sheet gold, applied foil, or cast—cannot be confirmed from this image alone).

decorative Late Period to Ptolemaic Period (as per catalogue; cannot independently date from this single view) good
Deities Wadjet (implied by eye-amulet motif; not explicitly inscribed)
Materials gold (likely sheet/foil; bright reflective surface)
Signs Wadjet/eye amulet motif (stylized eye)

Connections

Found at Thebes
Deities Wadjet

Cross-references (2)

  • BKM-Accession 08.480.217 tier-2
  • BKM-Object 3253 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.