Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art · other

Ibis Mummy

Source of record: Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Object Label: Though both of these mummies originally had elaborate wrappings, it is impossible to predict from the wrappings exactly what lies inside the package. CT scans and X-rays reveal that one ibis is complete and the other mummy contains feathers but no skeleton. The fragmentary one might represent a corrupt practice that cheated the worshipper of a complete animal. The mummy decorated with a herringbone pattern is complete. Catalogue description: Culture Egyptian Caption: Egyptian. Ibis Mummy, 664–30 B.C.E.. Linen, feathers or reeds, 4 1/8 × 3 1/2 × 12 5/8 in. (10.5 × 8.9 × 32.1 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 37.2042.18E. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum)

AI image analysis GPT-4o-2024-08-06

Machine-generated from the object's image on May 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A wrapped and preserved mummy, possibly of an animal, displayed on a cushion.

The image shows a well-preserved mummy with intricate linen wrappings creating a geometric pattern. The mummy is conical in shape, suggesting it might be an animal, such as a falcon or ibis, which were commonly mummified in ancient Egypt. The arrangement and condition of the wrappings indicate careful preparation, typical of Egyptian embalming practices.

funerary unknown excellent
Materials linen

Connections

Found at Saqqara
Materials Linen

Cross-references (2)

  • BKM-Accession 37.2042.18E tier-2
  • BKM-Object 186366 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.