Signet Ring
Description
Object Label: Because this ring bears a cartouche of King Khufu of Dynasty IV, known later to the Greeks as Cheops, it was once world famous as the actual signet ring of the builder of the Great Pyramid at Giza. The inscription, however, shows that it really belonged to a man named Neferibre who was a priest in the cults of Isis and the deified Cheops at Giza two thousand years after Cheops died. The ring is unusually heavy and is made of gold more than twenty-one karats pure. Caption: Signet Ring, ca. 664–404 B.C.E.. Gold, 11/16 × 1 × 7/8 in. (1.8 × 2.5 × 2.2 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 37.734E. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum)
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A small gold signet ring is shown in three-quarter view, with an engraved bezel displaying Egyptian-style iconography and hieroglyph-like signs.
The object is a gold ring with a rounded hoop and a flattened, oval/teardrop bezel. The bezel face bears incised, darkened lines forming a small central figure with a head/face and raised arms or a symbolic posture, alongside surrounding rectangular hieroglyph-like signs arranged in a band. A number of additional small marks appear near the upper and lower edges of the bezel, consistent with decorative/inscription layout for a personal seal. No cartouche is clearly legible at this resolution, and no Greek/Coptic/Arabic text is visible. The image background is plain gray, and no other inscriptions or mounting details are present.
Inscriptions (1)
Visible text (machine reading)
Cross-references (2)
- BKM-Accession 37.734E tier-2
- BKM-Object 4094 tier-2
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.