Taweret Amulet
Description
Caption: Taweret Amulet, 664–30 B.C.E.. Gold, 1 5/16 x 1/2 x 1/16 in. (3.3 x 1.2 x 0.2 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 08.480.214. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum)
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Small gold Egyptian amulet depicting a seated female form associated with Taweret, shown in profile with a stylized body and protective/amuletic iconography.
The image shows a small, rectangular gold sheet amulet with a raised repoussé figure on one face. The figure appears female and is shown in profile (facing to the left), with a large wig/headform, a stylized torso, and legs indicated with simplified contours. A prominent curving element near the abdomen/hip area suggests an intentional symbolic form. No surrounding cartouches or clear hieroglyph groups are visible on the gold surface in this photograph. There is no readable Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text. The background is a gray fabric or support material; the amulet itself is clearly gold-colored with an uneven edge consistent with a cast/hammered foil or thin sheet construction. The catalogue identifies it as a “Taweret Amulet”; the depicted female, hippopotamus-associated style is consistent at a general level, though specific Taweret attributes (e.g., explicit crocodile/hippo head details) are not sharply identifiable in this resolution. No royal names are present.
Cross-references (2)
- BKM-Accession 08.480.214 tier-2
- BKM-Object 19267 tier-2
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.