Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art · jewelry

Wadjet-Eye Amulet

Source of record: Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Caption: Wadjet-Eye Amulet, 664–332 B.C.E.. Faience, 2 5/8 x 1 7/8 x 5/16 in. (6.7 x 4.8 x 0.8 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 08.480.129. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum)

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

An eye-shaped amulet with a Wadjet-like appearance (stylized falcon/eye form), shown front-on against a dark backing.

The object is a small, dark faience (or faience-like) amulet shaped like a protective Eye, with a prominent almond eye and surrounding markings. Above the eye is an extended, banded or feather-like form resembling the eyebrow/upper ornament typical of Wadjet-style amulets. Flanking the eye are thick, tab-like vertical elements that may represent protective side frames or attachment prongs. On the lower right area there is a curled, spiral-like decorative element, consistent with incised/relief detailing on some Eye amulets. No readable hieroglyphic, Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text is visible in the provided image. The background is uniform and appears to be museum display backing; no cartouches or royal names are present.

decorative Late Period (as catalogued) good
Deities Wadjet (implied by Eye amulet)
Materials Faiencestone/ceramic-like body (coloration suggests faience)
Signs Wadjet/Eye (stylized protective eye)

Connections

Deities Wadjet
Materials Faience

Cross-references (2)

  • BKM-Accession 08.480.129 tier-2
  • BKM-Object 3242 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.