Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art · jewelry

Wadjet-eye Amulet

Source of record: Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Caption: Wadjet-eye Amulet, 664–343 B.C.E.. Gold, 7/16 x 5/8 x 1/16 in. (1.2 x 1.6 x 0.1 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 08.480.216. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum)

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A small gold amulet shaped like an eye (associated with the Wadjet/“Wadjet-eye”), shown in close-up against a plain background.

The image shows a single, flat, cast-gold object viewed from the front. The form is an outlined eye with an arched upper lid, a defined almond-shaped opening, and a prominent brow/upper ridge. Inside the eye there are raised details suggesting the pupil/iris, with a stylized, slightly recessed lower lid. The amulet has a simplified profile and a smooth, reflective surface with visible casting seams or tool marks along the edges. No clear hieroglyphic inscription or cartouche is visible on the object itself. No additional text is present in the image (no Greek/Coptic/Arabic). The object conforms in general to an eye-amulet silhouette consistent with a Wadjet-eye amulet, though the image does not provide enough detail to verify specific inscriptional or iconographic attributes beyond the eye form.

religious Late Period (per catalogue); exact dating not confirmable from image alone good
Materials gold

Connections

Found at Thebes
Deities Wadjet
Materials Gold

Cross-references (2)

  • BKM-Accession 08.480.216 tier-2
  • BKM-Object 19269 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.