ORAEC (Online Resource for Ancient Egyptian Corpus) · other

pCairo 602 frame IX verso (71 B) / pCairo 602 frame IX verso (71 B)

Source of record: ORAEC (Online Resource for Ancient Egyptian Corpus) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Archive, Urkunden, Vermerke (Altes Reich)→Abusir〈-Archiv〉→Tafel 71→pCairo 602 frame IX verso (71 B)→pCairo 602 frame IX verso (71 B)

Inscriptions (1)

Inscription #1 · Egyptian

Transcription

[sj]⸢p⸣ jn(r) wn tp ḥw,t ny wdi̯ m s,t 〈§〉 ⸢rḫt⸣ ⸢7⸣ km(,t) gmi̯ ⸢2⸣ jw,tjt 5 〈§〉 pr,j-ꜥꜣ jm,j-ḫt-ḥm,w-nṯr ⸢Jzzj⸣[⸮_?] 〈pr,j-ꜥꜣ〉 Wr-nṯr 〈pr,j-ꜥꜣ〉 Ṯntj 〈pr,j-ꜥꜣ〉 Ḥtp-jb 〈§〉 gmi̯ r 〈§〉 ⸢sḫs⸣f n 〈§〉 zꜣ

Translations (2)

EN AI · OpenAI gpt-4o-mini (from scholarly German)
Revision of the stones that were on the temple and those that do not lie in place. Total amount was 7, determined delivery is 2, shortfall is 5. (Signed:) Courtier and subordinate overseer of the priests Asosi[-...], Courtier Wer-netjer, Courtier Tjenti, Courtier Hetep-jb. (Form text?) Determined as: (Form text?) Verified by: (Form text?) Phyle:
DE scholarly · TLA / ORAEC
Revision der auf dem Tempel gewesenen Steine und die nicht an der Stelle liegen. Gesamtbetrag war 7, ermittelte Lieferung sind 2, Manko sind 5. (Gezeichnet:) Höfling und Unteraufseher der Priester Asosi[-...], Höfling Wer-netjer, Höfling Tjenti, Höfling Hetep-jb. (Formulartext?) Ermittelt als: (Formulartext?) Überprüft von: (Formulartext?) Phyle:

Connections

Found at Abusir

Cross-references (2)

  • TLA-Text PKWKVONTMVCWBOMHDFRAFUAN5A tier-1
  • ORAEC-id oraec2586 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by ORAEC (Online Resource for Ancient Egyptian Corpus).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.