Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art · architecture

Floral Frieze

Source of record: Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Object Label: Although the use of glazed tiles and colored paste inlays is known from as early as the Old Kingdom, the apogee of their use came during the New Kingdom (Dynasties XVIIII–XX). An almost identical frieze of lotuses, other flowers, and grape clusters is known to have adorned a wall of a palace of Ramesses III at Tell el Yahudiya in lower (northern) Egypt. Caption: Floral Frieze, ca 1187–1156 B.C.E.. Faience, 2 1/2 × 1 × 11 1/2 in. (6.4 × 2.5 × 29.2 cm) mounted: 5 × 14 × 1 1/4 in. (12.7 × 35.6 × 3.2 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 55.182a-i. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum)

AI image analysis GPT-4o-2024-08-06

Machine-generated from the object's image on May 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A collection of faience and ceramic amulets with intricate designs.

The image depicts a series of ancient Egyptian amulets crafted from faience and ceramic. Each piece features unique designs, including depictions of floral motifs and possibly stylized natural elements. The materials exhibit different colors like blue, beige, and green, indicative of the typical faience look. The craftsmanship reflects a sophisticated understanding of material and design, common in ancient Egyptian artistry.

decorative unknown excellent
Materials faienceceramic

Connections

Royals Ramesses
Materials FaienceCeramic

Cross-references (2)

  • BKM-Accession 55.182a-i tier-2
  • BKM-Object 3620 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.