ORAEC (Online Resource for Ancient Egyptian Corpus) · other

Opferformel / Architrav des Ni-Ptah

Source of record: ORAEC (Online Resource for Ancient Egyptian Corpus) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

〈Grabinschriften des Alten Reiches〉→Gisa→West Field 〈(PM III, 47-179)〉→Einzelobjekte→Architrav des Ni-Ptah→Opferformel

Inscriptions (1)

Inscription #1 · Egyptian

Transcription

ḥtp-ḏi̯ nswt ḥtp-〈〈ḏi̯〉〉 Jnp,w ḫnt,j-zḥ-nṯr 〈§〉 qrs.t =f (m) z(my),t m jmn,t jꜣwi̯(.w) nfr ḫ(r) nṯr-ꜥꜣ (j)r(,j-j)ḫ(,t)-nswt jmꜣḫ,w-ḫr-Ptḥ 〈§〉 pr-ḫrw n =f (m) Wpi̯-rnp,t Ḏḥw,t(yt) ḥꜣb nb rꜥw-nb N,j-Ptḥ

Translations (2)

EN AI · OpenAI gpt-4o-mini (from scholarly German)
A sacrifice that the king gives, a sacrifice that Anubis, who is before the god hall, 〈〈gives〉〉: May he be buried (in) the burial place in the west (realm of the dead), being beautifully old with the great god, the steward of the king's wealth and provided for at Ptah. A funerary offering for him (on) New Year's Day, Thoth Festival, and every festival, daily, (to) Ni-Ptah.
DE scholarly · TLA / ORAEC
Ein Opfer, das der König gibt, ein Opfer, das Anubis, der vor der Gotteshalle ist, 〈〈gibt〉〉: Er möge bestattet werden (in) der Begräbnisstätte im Westen (Totenreich), indem er schön alt ist beim großen Gott, der Verwalter des Königsvermögens und Versorgte bei Ptah. Ein Totenopfer für ihn (am) Neujahrstag, Thot-Fest und jedem Fest, täglich, (dem) Ni-Ptah.

Connections

Found at Giza
Deities Ptah

Cross-references (2)

  • TLA-Text AN4EQTJBRBBB5JJXDFRMBTPFEM tier-1
  • ORAEC-id oraec5726 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by ORAEC (Online Resource for Ancient Egyptian Corpus).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.