Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art · other

Cat and Mouse

Source of record: Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Object Label: Animals imitating human behavior were well-known in Egyptian art. Yet their meaning is uncertain. Here, a feline funerary priest approaches a mouse with offerings. The mouse wears a lotus flower on its head, sits on a chair, sniffs a flower, and holds out a cup to be filled. The cat, standing on his hind legs, fans the mouse and offers a roasted duck and a piece of linen. People performing these actions in Egyptian art are usually at a banquet. A cat serving a mouse might represent a humorous satire or illustrate a now-lost story. Caption: Cat and Mouse, ca. 1295–1075 B.C.E.. Limestone, ink, 3 1/2 x 6 13/16 x 7/16 in. (8.9 x 17.3 x 1.1 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 37.51E. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum (Gavin Ashworth, photographer))

AI image analysis GPT-4o-2024-08-06

Machine-generated from the object's image on May 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A drawing of two anthropomorphic figures interacting, possibly deities.

The artifact is a piece of limestone featuring a sketch of two anthropomorphic figures, one of which has a feline head and the other possibly a rodent or hippo head. They appear to be interacting, with one offering a large flower to the other, who is seated. The style is simple line drawing, indicative of an informal or practice piece such as an ostracon.

decorative New Kingdom good
Materials limestone

Connections

Found at Thebes
Materials Limestone

Cross-references (2)

  • BKM-Accession 37.51E tier-2
  • BKM-Object 3952 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.