Sculptor's Trial Piece
Description
Caption: Sculptor's Trial Piece, ca. 1292–525 B.C.E.. Limestone, 6 5/16 × 4 5/16 × 1 in. (16.1 × 11 × 2.5 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Gift of Evangeline Wilbour Blashfield, Theodora Wilbour, and Victor Wilbour honoring the wishes of their mother, Charlotte Beebe Wilbour, as a memorial to their father, Charles Edwin Wilbour, 16.55. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum)
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Fragment of a carved limestone trial/study piece bearing incised test marks and partial hieroglyphic forms, including a rope-like/looped symbol and clustered signs resembling a “three” group.
The image shows a small, irregularly edged limestone block fragment photographed against a neutral gray background. The surface bears shallow incised lines and partial hieroglyphic sign outlines. In the upper left/center there is a curving, hook-like vertical form with a second line adjacent, resembling a single tall hieroglyph or stroke. In the upper right there are vertical incisions that may be part of a larger sign. In the lower right area, there is a clustered set of four oval/“bubble” elements arranged in a roughly rectangular group, and near it a short horizontal band of darker, worn incisions. Overall, the markings appear schematic and incomplete, consistent with a sculptor’s trial or practice carving rather than a complete inscription. No readable cartouche or royal name is clearly identifiable from the photo. No Greek/Coptic/Arabic text is visible.
Inscriptions (1)
Visible text (machine reading)
Connections
Cross-references (2)
- BKM-Accession 16.55 tier-2
- BKM-Object 9323 tier-2
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.