Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art · other

Ostrakon

Source of record: Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Object Label: Parallels from Egyptian tomb paintings suggest that the man depicted here is a fowler and the object he holds in his right hand is a bag filled with captured birds. The man is rendered in formal Egyptian drawing conventions: his form is outlined in black ink, and his skin color is shown as a single uniform hue. This treatment contrasts with the sketchy, informal drawing of the two birds above him. Caption: Ostrakon, ca. 1336–1250 B.C.E.. Limestone, pigment, 4 9/16 x 4 7/8 x 1 1/8 in. (11.6 x 12.4 x 2.9 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 68.46.2. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum)

AI image analysis GPT-4o-2024-08-06

Machine-generated from the object's image on May 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A painted limestone fragment depicting a human figure holding a staff.

The artifact is a painted fragment of limestone showcasing a human figure, possibly a scribe or figure of significant importance, holding a staff or a similar object. The art style is typical of Egyptian artistry with its profile depiction and use of earthy colors. The composition suggests a scene of daily life or a ceremonial act. Notable features include the presence of faint lines and details on the figure's face and a bird present in the scenery, indicating symbolic or narrative content.

daily life New Kingdom fragmentary
Materials limestone

Connections

Found at Egypt
Materials Limestone

Cross-references (2)

  • BKM-Accession 68.46.2 tier-2
  • BKM-Object 3770 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.