Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art · statue

Face from the Lid of a Sarcophagus

Source of record: Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Object Label: The broad, flat character of this face indicates that it came from a sarcophagus. The fillet with lotus flowers is a symbol of light, life, and rebirth. The work's dating is based on its style: the organic modeling, heavily lidded eyes, and full, sensuous lips turned up in a smile find their best parallels in art of late Dynasty XVIII and early Dynasty XIX. Caption: Face from the Lid of a Sarcophagus, ca. 1336–1250 B.C.E.. Sandstone, 18 × 17 × 5 in. (45.7 × 43.2 × 12.7 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 85.166.

AI image analysis GPT-4o-2024-08-06

Machine-generated from the object's image on May 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

The artifact is a dark stone depiction of a human head with a serene expression and tight cap-like headgear.

This is a dark stone sculpture representing a human head, characterized by smooth, idealized features typical of ancient Egyptian art. The head is adorned with a close-fitting cap that suggests either royal or noble status. The sculpture is relatively intact, though it shows signs of age and surface wear, indicating its antiquity.

royal New Kingdom good
Materials stone

Connections

Found at Egypt
Materials Stone

Cross-references (2)

  • BKM-Accession 85.166 tier-2
  • BKM-Object 3918 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.