Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art · statue

Relief Fragment of Akhenaten

Source of record: Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Caption: Relief Fragment of Akhenaten, ca. 1352–1336 B.C.E.. Limestone, 9/16 x 3 1/8 in. (1.4 x 7.9 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Gift of the Egypt Exploration Society, 36.964. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum)

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A small limestone relief fragment with shallow incised traces of an image and a few hieroglyph-like marks on one face.

The object appears as a weathered, horizontally placed fragment of carved stone (likely limestone), photographed on a neutral background. One side shows shallow, worn relief/engraving and a small cluster of incised signs near the center; however, the marks are too eroded to read confidently as specific hieroglyphs or to identify a clear royal name or deity. No legible Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text is visible. There is no clearly preserved cartouche, and no distinct iconographic figure (e.g., fully identifiable god or king) can be confirmed from the fragment as photographed. Overall condition is fragmentary and moderately worn.

decorative New Kingdom, Amarna Period (uncertain; based on catalogue attribution only) fragmentary
Materials limestone (weathered stone)
Signs incised hieroglyph-like mark(s) (unreadable due to erosion) ×3

Connections

Royals Akhenaten
Materials Limestone

Cross-references (2)

  • BKM-Accession 36.964 tier-2
  • BKM-Object 47043 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.