Torso of Akhenaten
Description
Caption: Torso of Akhenaten, ca. 1352–1336 B.C.E.. Limestone, 21 x 13 x 16 in. (53.3 x 33 x 40.6 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 58.2. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum)
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Fragmentary limestone torso bearing incised relief decoration in the form of vertically oriented cartouche-like ovals with surrounding hieroglyphic signs.
The image shows the upper portion of a carved stone figure fragment presented front-on. The surface preserves a large, roughly oval body area with the tops of the shoulders and upper chest visible; the lower portion is broken away. Three incised cartouche-shaped cartouches/oval frames with vertical hieroglyphic groupings are carved across the chest area: two larger cartouche-like frames placed symmetrically left and right, and a smaller cartouche-like frame centered beneath them. The incisions are shallow-relief/engraved and include vertical sign columns within the frames, but the individual characters are not clear enough to securely identify as specific royal names from the available resolution. No clear depiction of a specific deity figure (e.g., faces, crowns, or iconographic attributes) is visible on this torso fragment. There is no readable Greek/Coptic/Arabic text visible. The only inscriptions appear to be the hieroglyphic relief signs within the cartouche-like frames. The object is consistent in medium and general New Kingdom Amarna iconography in having cartouche-like royal-name units, but the exact identification as “Torso of Akhenaten” cannot be confirmed from the image due to insufficient legibility of the sign content.
Cross-references (2)
- BKM-Accession 58.2 tier-2
- BKM-Object 3640 tier-2
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.