Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art · jewelry

Wadjet-eye Ring

Source of record: Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Object Label: Rings The earliest Egyptian rings were purely decorative, but later rings came to carry significance. By the Eighteenth Dynasty of the New Kingdom, they were frequently inscribed with the name of a god, a king, or the owner. The most popular type was made of faience and bore the name of the reigning monarch. Archaeologists have discovered thousands of these simple, mold-made rings; they were probably distributed as mementos at religious or state celebrations. Other rings feature protective symbols, including the wedjat-eye. Wealthy members of Eighteenth Dynasty society often wore rings made of inlaid glass or semiprecious stones. Caption: Wadjet-eye Ring, ca. 1352–1336 B.C.E.. Faience, 3/8 x Diam. 9/16 in. (0.9 x 1.5 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Gift of the Egypt Exploration Society, 34.6050. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum)

AI image analysis GPT-4o-2024-08-06

Machine-generated from the object's image on May 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

The image depicts a small artifact shaped like the Eye of Horus.

The artifact is a small, possibly faience amulet in the shape of the Eye of Horus, known as the Wadjet. It features a smooth texture and dark coloration, characteristic of protective amulets used in ancient Egypt. The design is simple yet symbolic, emphasizing protective qualities.

decorative unknown good
Materials faience
Signs Eye of Horus

Connections

Found at Tell el-Amarna
Deities Wadjet
Materials Faience

Cross-references (2)

  • BKM-Accession 34.6050 tier-2
  • BKM-Object 3348 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.