ORAEC (Online Resource for Ancient Egyptian Corpus) · other

Speisetischbeischriften / Nordwand

Source of record: ORAEC (Online Resource for Ancient Egyptian Corpus) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

〈Grabinschriften des Alten Reiches〉→Sakkara→Teti-Friedhof→Mastaba des Seanchuiptah→Raum 1→Nordwand→Speisetischszene mit Opferliste→Speisetischbeischriften

Inscriptions (1)

Inscription #1 · Egyptian

Transcription

dbḥ,t-ḥtp ḥnk(,t)[.pl] ḫꜣ ꜣpd ḫꜣ ꜣpd ḫꜣ jḥ ḫꜣ mnḫ,t ḫꜣ tʾ ḥnq,t pꜣ,t [Sꜥnḫ-wj-]Pt[ḥ] 〈§〉 ḫꜣ ꜣpd ḫꜣ ꜣpd ḫꜣ mnḫ,t ḫꜣ jḥ ḫꜣ tʾ ḥnq,t pꜣ,t ḫꜣ ꜣpd ḫꜣ ꜣpd ḫꜣ šs

Translations (2)

EN AI · OpenAI gpt-4o-mini (from scholarly German)
The requirement for offerings: one thousand of poultry, one thousand of poultry, one thousand of cattle, one thousand of clothing, one thousand of bread, beer, pastries for [Seanchui]ptah. One thousand of poultry, one thousand of poultry, one thousand of clothing, one thousand of cattle, one thousand of bread, beer, and pastries, one thousand of poultry, one thousand of poultry, one thousand of poultry, one thousand of alabaster.
DE scholarly · TLA / ORAEC
Der Opfergaben-Speisebedarf: Tausend an Geflügel, tausend an Geflügel, tausend an Rind, tausend an Kleidung, tausend an Brot, Bier, Gebäck für [Seanchui]ptah. Tausend an Geflügel, tausend an Geflügel, tausend an Kleidung, tausend an Rind, tausend an Brot, Bier und Gebäck, tausend an Geflügel, tausend an Geflügel, tausend an Geflügel, tausend an Alabaster.

Cross-references (2)

  • TLA-Text 6WYNNKDPNZC5LFI3KL5LRNS2A4 tier-1
  • ORAEC-id oraec9545 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by ORAEC (Online Resource for Ancient Egyptian Corpus).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.