Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art · architecture

Relief Fragment with Hieroglyphs

Source of record: Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Object Label: Egyptian hieroglyphs use images of humans, animals, plants, and objects to represent sounds as well as complete words. The intricacy and beauty of some signs qualify them as miniature works of art. These highly detailed and brightly painted hieroglyphs once formed part of a religious inscription on a square pillar or corner of a tomb. Most Egyptian reliefs were once as colorful as this text. Caption: Relief Fragment with Hieroglyphs, ca. 1426–1190 B.C.E.. Limestone, pigment, 15 x 12 3/4 x 4 3/4 in. (38.1 x 32.4 x 12.1 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 37.1892E. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum)

AI image analysis GPT-4o-2024-08-06

Machine-generated from the object's image on May 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Fragment of an ancient Egyptian wall painting depicting daily activities.

The artifact is a painted limestone fragment showcasing scenes of daily life, with individuals engaged in various activities. The figures are rendered in a traditional Egyptian profile, with a focus on distinct, clear outlines and vibrant colors. The composition includes multiple vertical registers with depictions of objects and individuals, known for its illustrative style characteristic of ancient Egyptian art.

daily life New Kingdom fragmentary
Materials limestonepaint

Connections

Found at Thebes
Materials LimestonePaint

Cross-references (2)

  • BKM-Accession 37.1892E tier-2
  • BKM-Object 118397 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.