Perfume bottle in the shape of a hes-vase inlaid with the figure of a princess
Description
Travertine (Egyptian alabaster), carnelian, obsidian,gold, and colored glass inlay
AI image analysis claude-haiku-4-5
Machine-generated from the object's image on May 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A delicate alabaster perfume bottle in the shape of a hes-vase (shrine form) featuring an inlaid figure of a standing princess rendered in carnelian with blue-painted details at the base.
This exquisite New Kingdom object exemplifies the refined luxury craftsmanship of the Amarna Period. The vessel takes the distinctive form of a hes-shrine, characterized by a broad rounded bulbous body surmounting a slender stem, with a flared neck topped by a broad horizontal finial. The composition showcases sophisticated materials: pale travertine (Egyptian alabaster) forms the primary vessel. The central decorative element features a female figure inlaid in warm carnelian, depicting a standing princess in profile facing right, rendered in typical Amarna style with an elongated body and naturalistic proportions. The figure's eyes are crafted from obsidian, providing striking contrast. At the base of the figure, a decorative band of blue and reddish-brown colored glass inlay creates a structured composition suggesting either a lotus motif or ornamental boundary. The craftsmanship demonstrates the integration of multiple precious materials—stone carving combined with elaborate inlay work—characteristic of elite Amarna Period luxury goods intended for perfumed oils.
Connections
Cross-references (4)
- Wikidata-Q Q116235440 tier-1
- Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- Inventory-Number 40.2.4 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
- MET-Object 543992 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.