Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · architecture

Fragmentary Seal Impression from Tutankhamun's Embalming Cache

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

New Kingdom, Dynasty 18, reign of Tutankhamun, ca. 1336–1327 B.C. Nile mud. L. 3 cm (1 3/16 in.); W. 2 cm (13/16 in.). From: Embalming Cache of Tutankhamun (KV 54), Valley of the Kings, Upper Egypt, Thebes, Egypt. Excavation: Davis/Ayrton excavations, 1907–08. Credit: Gift of Theodore M. Davis, 1909.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

Small, fragmentary mud seal impression with raised hieroglyphic/ornamental marks forming a compact block-like motif.

The image shows a small, irregular fragment of light-colored Nile mud (matrix visible) bearing a molded, raised design. The relief includes vertical and box-like/rectilinear elements that resemble hieroglyphic signs, though the fragment is too eroded and incomplete to read specific characters confidently. No legible cartouche or royal name is clearly visible. There is no clear evidence of metal, wood, or other materials. No Greek, Coptic, or Arabic text is present.

unclear New Kingdom (consistent with seal-impression tradition, exact royal attribution unclear from the image). fragmentary
Materials nile mud
Signs unidentified hieroglyphic/ornamental sign (rectilinear/boxed motif) ×3

Connections

Deities Ptah
Royals Tutankhamun
Materials Nile Mud

Cross-references (4)

  • Wikidata-Q Q116273528 tier-1
  • Collection-QID Q160236 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • Inventory-Number 09.184.260 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
  • MET-Object 549601 tier-2 (wikidata-mediated)
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.