Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) · jewelry

Part (?) of a bracelet or armlet with uraei

Source of record: Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

Bracelet or armlet fragment, uraei. Ptolemaic or Roman Period, 304 B.C.–A.D. 364. Silver. H. 6.2 x W. 6.8 cm (2 7/16 x 2 11/16 in.). From: Tell el-Balamun (Diospolis Inferior), Central Delta, Egypt. Excavation: Carnarvon/Carter excavations, 1913. Credit: Purchase, Edward S. Harkness Gift, 1926.

AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano

Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.

A small fragment of an ancient Egyptian bracelet/armlet composed of linked metal rings, decorated with looped elements and vertical finials resembling uraeus-like forms.

The image shows a detached portion of a bracelet or armlet made from darkened metal wire/rings forming multiple rounded coils. Across the front and within the ring framework are four vertical, lozenge-shaped ornament elements with incised longitudinal detailing, each mounted on small ring junctions. The ornament arrangement and the central paired vertical elements match the catalogue description of a bracelet/armlet section that would have included uraei decoration, though the specific uraeus heads and bodies are not clearly visible in this view. No definite hieroglyphic inscriptions, cartouches, or script are visible on the ornamented elements. The metal appears consistent with silver/brassy-looking surface wear, with no clear enamel or other materials apparent.

decorative Ptolemaic or Roman Period (as given by catalogue; specific style dating uncertain from this fragment alone) fragmentary
Deities uraeus (unconfirmed; catalogue implies)
Materials metal (appears silver-colored/darkened)wire/ring links

Connections

Deities Uraeus
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Metropolitan Museum of Art — Egyptian Art (Open Access).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.